<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	
	<link>http://transcendr.com</link>
	<description>there is something out there that is bigger than me</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForTranscendr" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Enough, Part One by Leeann Petty</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/451444917/</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeann Petty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=9#comment-11</guid>
		<description>evkktdf790un8gmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>evkktdf790un8gmm</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/451444917" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/05/18/enough-part-one/#comment-11</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Constantine Rides Again by John Hummel</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/406366499/</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=26#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Uh - that was me right above.  Stupid sxipper - used my game login.  (sigh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh - that was me right above.  Stupid sxipper - used my game login.  (sigh)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/406366499" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/08/20/constantine-rides-again/#comment-10</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Constantine Rides Again by Dark Paladin</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/406366500/</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Paladin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=26#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I like how you use the historical ties from Constantine to Bush today - the "rally the troops!" idea.

Really, this isn't anything unusual.  Remember John Brown was a religious zealot who set out to free the slaves, Harriett Tubman was known as "Moses", Martin Luther King drew on the power of the religious community to start his fight against prejudice.  Both sides of the civil war sang "Battle Hymn of the Republic" with different words.

I think what's interesting over time is how the conservatives pitched Christian values - but they're always along culture lines.  When religious leaders first got into bed with the GOP, it wasn't over abortion - it was because they didn't want to pay taxes on church owned businesses in Florida (see the book "Thy Kingdom Come" by Balmer).  Later it was tied into abortion and gay issues.

I've seen Obama doing something of the same thing - talking about his faith, but instead of rallying it towards war a la Bush/Constantine, he's rallying it into his projects:  health care, jobs for the poor, etc.  

I'll be honest - I'm more of an Obama type - I think that Christianity should be focused on the things that Jesus actually talked about (feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, healing the sick), instead of the stuff he didn't ever refer to (abortion and gay rights).  I'm certainly not a Calvinist and think that the rich are so because they're righteous.

But no matter which side you're on, it's pretty clear that Bush and Co have used religious voters to their advantage.  Look at 2004, and how many states had gay marriage amendments on the ballot.  That's probably the one thing that gave Bush the extra 2-3% of the popular vote he needed to get over the top - without them, we'd be talking about President Kerry, and Obama would just be an interesting senator that few had heard of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how you use the historical ties from Constantine to Bush today - the &#8220;rally the troops!&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>Really, this isn&#8217;t anything unusual.  Remember John Brown was a religious zealot who set out to free the slaves, Harriett Tubman was known as &#8220;Moses&#8221;, Martin Luther King drew on the power of the religious community to start his fight against prejudice.  Both sides of the civil war sang &#8220;Battle Hymn of the Republic&#8221; with different words.</p>
<p>I think what&#8217;s interesting over time is how the conservatives pitched Christian values - but they&#8217;re always along culture lines.  When religious leaders first got into bed with the GOP, it wasn&#8217;t over abortion - it was because they didn&#8217;t want to pay taxes on church owned businesses in Florida (see the book &#8220;Thy Kingdom Come&#8221; by Balmer).  Later it was tied into abortion and gay issues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen Obama doing something of the same thing - talking about his faith, but instead of rallying it towards war a la Bush/Constantine, he&#8217;s rallying it into his projects:  health care, jobs for the poor, etc.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest - I&#8217;m more of an Obama type - I think that Christianity should be focused on the things that Jesus actually talked about (feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, healing the sick), instead of the stuff he didn&#8217;t ever refer to (abortion and gay rights).  I&#8217;m certainly not a Calvinist and think that the rich are so because they&#8217;re righteous.</p>
<p>But no matter which side you&#8217;re on, it&#8217;s pretty clear that Bush and Co have used religious voters to their advantage.  Look at 2004, and how many states had gay marriage amendments on the ballot.  That&#8217;s probably the one thing that gave Bush the extra 2-3% of the popular vote he needed to get over the top - without them, we&#8217;d be talking about President Kerry, and Obama would just be an interesting senator that few had heard of.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/406366500" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/08/20/constantine-rides-again/#comment-9</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Constantine Rides Again by Pedro el Stinko</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/374849863/</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro el Stinko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=26#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Bravo, my anonymous friend.    How appropriate to quote The Who.

My gripe, is how leaders of the Christian Right try to raise that banner on behalf of candidates.  Is it so much Carl and his cronies, or is it pat robertson and the like that decide who they want to prop up, and more importantly, who they want to squash down in the process, so they can further their own political agendas to the nation?  

Why is it that we, as Christians, seem to fear having someone in office that is less than Godly?  Why is it that we view the extent of our duties as followers of Christ to simply elect "christian" leaders so our lives will look all pretty?  Heck, where did the belief come from that if we have Christian leaders, even sincere ones, that our lives would be better?  

Watching the insane Dr. Dobson (whom I've never been a critic of in the past) rant on how Obama has criticized the bible and made light of it, when he himself is taking Obama out of context.  Now, I'm not a supporter of Obama, but I'm certainly no supporter of the religious leaders that try to squash him, simply because of their fear of having a man that they believe is secretly a muslim become the leader of the free world?  

Of course, we all know that Obama isn't a Muslim.  They know it.  Obama knows it, and we know it.  But that doesn't stop them from using slight of lips in order to put just enough fear in us.

All along, we've forgotten that no matter who God sovereignly places within the presidency, that GOD is the ruler of the universe.  Therefore making it somewhat insignificant who we vote for, except where we become a part of God simply carrying out His plan perfectly.

Remember that God sovereignly placed kings over Israel throughout it's history (biblical history, that is).  And many, if not all, of those kings were men who did not fear God.  But yet, God's plan was carried out with perfection.

So I'm sick of being manipulated by religious leadership.  By presidents that play on my faith in Christ.  

Show me a man who would feed the poor, dine with sinners, and lead with humility.  I'll vote for that guy.  And I promise you that Mike Huckabee isn't the man I'm thinking of here.

Cheers,

Pedro el Stinko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, my anonymous friend.    How appropriate to quote The Who.</p>
<p>My gripe, is how leaders of the Christian Right try to raise that banner on behalf of candidates.  Is it so much Carl and his cronies, or is it pat robertson and the like that decide who they want to prop up, and more importantly, who they want to squash down in the process, so they can further their own political agendas to the nation?  </p>
<p>Why is it that we, as Christians, seem to fear having someone in office that is less than Godly?  Why is it that we view the extent of our duties as followers of Christ to simply elect &#8220;christian&#8221; leaders so our lives will look all pretty?  Heck, where did the belief come from that if we have Christian leaders, even sincere ones, that our lives would be better?  </p>
<p>Watching the insane Dr. Dobson (whom I&#8217;ve never been a critic of in the past) rant on how Obama has criticized the bible and made light of it, when he himself is taking Obama out of context.  Now, I&#8217;m not a supporter of Obama, but I&#8217;m certainly no supporter of the religious leaders that try to squash him, simply because of their fear of having a man that they believe is secretly a muslim become the leader of the free world?  </p>
<p>Of course, we all know that Obama isn&#8217;t a Muslim.  They know it.  Obama knows it, and we know it.  But that doesn&#8217;t stop them from using slight of lips in order to put just enough fear in us.</p>
<p>All along, we&#8217;ve forgotten that no matter who God sovereignly places within the presidency, that GOD is the ruler of the universe.  Therefore making it somewhat insignificant who we vote for, except where we become a part of God simply carrying out His plan perfectly.</p>
<p>Remember that God sovereignly placed kings over Israel throughout it&#8217;s history (biblical history, that is).  And many, if not all, of those kings were men who did not fear God.  But yet, God&#8217;s plan was carried out with perfection.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m sick of being manipulated by religious leadership.  By presidents that play on my faith in Christ.  </p>
<p>Show me a man who would feed the poor, dine with sinners, and lead with humility.  I&#8217;ll vote for that guy.  And I promise you that Mike Huckabee isn&#8217;t the man I&#8217;m thinking of here.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Pedro el Stinko</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/374849863" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/08/20/constantine-rides-again/#comment-7</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enough, Part Two by Judd Kussrow</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/296058321/</link>
		<dc:creator>Judd Kussrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=10#comment-6</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you have stepped across the line in the sand right there at the end.

The prevailing schism seems to be between those who believe there is an answer to the meaning of life and those who have resigned that there is not.  One camp reasons a case for "optimism" while the other emotionally pleads  "hope".  All have reason to despair and each has a unique confidence in something.

The belief that there is more or less to life has been confidently carved with your tool of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you have stepped across the line in the sand right there at the end.</p>
<p>The prevailing schism seems to be between those who believe there is an answer to the meaning of life and those who have resigned that there is not.  One camp reasons a case for &#8220;optimism&#8221; while the other emotionally pleads  &#8220;hope&#8221;.  All have reason to despair and each has a unique confidence in something.</p>
<p>The belief that there is more or less to life has been confidently carved with your tool of choice.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/296058321" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/05/22/enough-part-two/#comment-6</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enough, Part One by Judd Kussrow</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/296058322/</link>
		<dc:creator>Judd Kussrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=9#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The "Sovernty of God" is a "christian-eze" term that few really want to understand for the gravity of its implications.  Christians say that thier god is an "awesome" god, and that He is the source of all good things.  The kicker is that our concept of good and bad, fair and unjust are relative to the Source.  This means that if God's character examplified evil, then evil would become good - because his character defines good.

So what does all this meta-physical jibba-jabba have to do with current events.  Well, basically what tools do have to question the Source that He did not give you.  All you can do be be in "awe" of the "sum" of His work.  We live and die for this Glory in perfect justice, even though your imprefect perception can not fathom it.

It would be like an ant objecting to what is going on in the UN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Sovernty of God&#8221; is a &#8220;christian-eze&#8221; term that few really want to understand for the gravity of its implications.  Christians say that thier god is an &#8220;awesome&#8221; god, and that He is the source of all good things.  The kicker is that our concept of good and bad, fair and unjust are relative to the Source.  This means that if God&#8217;s character examplified evil, then evil would become good - because his character defines good.</p>
<p>So what does all this meta-physical jibba-jabba have to do with current events.  Well, basically what tools do have to question the Source that He did not give you.  All you can do be be in &#8220;awe&#8221; of the &#8220;sum&#8221; of His work.  We live and die for this Glory in perfect justice, even though your imprefect perception can not fathom it.</p>
<p>It would be like an ant objecting to what is going on in the UN.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/296058322" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/05/18/enough-part-one/#comment-5</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enough, Part One by Jenny, Bloggess</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~3/296058323/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny, Bloggess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcendr.com/?p=9#comment-4</guid>
		<description>It's a good question...one I have no answer for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good question&#8230;one I have no answer for.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTranscendr/~4/296058323" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://transcendr.com/2008/05/18/enough-part-one/#comment-4</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
